A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours in excess of the development of the wall at a coastal site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted national attention adhering to an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of planning breaches, environmental concerns, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times report about René Collier as well as Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has progressed into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design works at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, seek to build their family property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where advancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted under arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally citizens of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by developing a wall further than the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment on a Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially inside of a delicate coastal natural environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding to be able to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water all through significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website turned Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail via the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 grew to become widely searched phrases as visitors sought to understand the track record and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
For the Main in the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as built, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems connected to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally pressured that their action is motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few simply looking to create a relatives house in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed based on Specialist information and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament that lots of observers see as progressively widespread. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced previously been linked to community advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very diverse Skilled backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the physical fact of your coastline and also the symbolic character on the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling disorders. Still the human aspect remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long once the authorized expenses happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. Whether or not it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as René Collier prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin lately.